Tagged: Tag it Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • kyle 8:41 pm on September 17, 2011 Permalink |
    Tags: Tag it   

    Response to Kathleen’s Request – 9 17 11… 

    Response to Kathleen’s Request – 9/17/11
    Kyle D. Brown (kdbrown@csupomona.edu)
    Motivation for work:
    I have become involved in various food projects over the years, including recent work in the South Los Angeles community of Watts, due to a wide variety of interests. However, I believe my overarching motivation is due to my interest in promoting “ecological sovereignty” for marginalized communities. By ecological sovereignty, I am referring to the notion of local communities asserting control over resources and systems which are critical to their sustainability, including food, water, energy and other ecological resources. Many marginalized communities have realized they cannot rely on traditional institutions (government, free market, or even some aid organizations) to chart sustainable futures, and are exploring strategies to increase their ecological sovereignty. This interest in empowering local communities to become sovereign builds on previous scholarship I have conducted related to critical social consciousness and participatory appraisal processes in communities. Food is an effective access point for many communities to begin considering sovereignty issues.
    While an interest in empowerment and sovereignty describes my personal motivations, these projects typically include a diverse group of experts from a variety of disciplines, who may have different motivations, such as an interest in technological innovation or ecosystem impact. I believe the challenge for our organization is to engage complex and robust problems, which allow multiple interests to effectively engage in the project.
    Expectations:
    Based on my knowledge of our local partner, and experience with other community engagement projects, I had a number of expectations/preconceptions before engaging in the Watts food project. These included:
    1.The partner and the community they represent were passionate about local food, based in large part on the fact that they approached us about the project. This would provide significant momentum for the project.
    2.The partner organization had over 40 years of experience working in Watts promoting economic development and human rights. So sovereignty was a central interest in the organization and they possessed leadership abilities and a strong social network within the community. However previous experience with this partner had raised some concern about their ability to follow through on their commitments.
    3.They viewed our role in the project primarily as one which provides technical assistance on food production and related agro-ecological issues, in support of their established vision for local food. This would mean that broader contributions would have to be carefully crafted in order to be well-received.
    Modes of Engagement:
    The project is in its early stages and is ongoing. However multiple forms of engagement have been utilized and are planned for future work. These include external systems analyses conducted by students and faculty in order to assess the current state of the food system serving Watts, along with a variety of participatory appraisal techniques. I use a framework adapted from international development literature to categorize techniques as spatial (participatory mapping, transect walks, etc.), temporal (seasonal/daily profiles, trend analysis, etc.) and relational (social network mapping, institutional diagramming, etc.). While participatory work is limited on this project today, we expect to engage spatial, temporal, and relational methods throughout this project.
    Unforseen Implications:
    1.Disconnects between our local partner and the broader community were revealed early in the process. Over the past 20 years, the area has transformed from a predominantly African-American community to a predominantly Latino community (primarily Mexican immigrants). So there is a racial dynamic at work that informs power relationships in the community. In addition, early investigations revealed that connections with other institutions and organizations in the community were not as strong as expected. These revelations have added to the challenges of accessing the community and fostering local leadership and capacity on this project.
    2.The partner’s passion for the project was heavily biased toward the production component of the food system and a vision for extensive community gardening anchored by a local demonstration “farm” they had conceptualized prior to engaging us on the project. However, analysis of the food system revealed significant problems and opportunities related to distribution, processing and retailing of food products. These opportunities reinforce other interest of the partner in terms of job training and economic development, but they continue to view this as a gardening/farm development project, as opposed to a broader vision.
    3.The systems approach to sustainability reveals the interrelationship of critical resources. As such, students revealed that the goal of food sovereignty may be dependent on achieving sovereignty related to other critical resources, particularly water. So the way in which these types of projects engage in dialogue concerning other resources is a vital issue.
    4.Our own capacity to follow-through on the opportunities presented by this project is a major limiting factor, given limitations in time, money and other logistical challenges (distance, institutional policies, etc). This reinforces the need to build a broad coalition of partners within the University to sustain this project over time.

     
  • catherine 2:15 pm on August 28, 2011 Permalink |
    Tags: Tag it   

    Hi everyone What a pleasure to be part… 

    Hi everyone,

    What a pleasure to be part of this group! I’m still having trouble accessing the posted article from Cultural Geographies, but hopefully I’ll figure out a way to read it this week. I’ll also try to find some interesting material to post that we can all discuss.

    Wishing you well – Cathy

     
    • Brian 10:42 am on September 2, 2011 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      Hi Cathy,

      I have updated the posted file. The earlier one appears to have been corrupted, but this one should work.

      Brian

    • valentine 5:39 pm on September 16, 2011 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      Re: the article (which has now been emailed around a couple of times for those who haven’t been able to download it) It’s a good piece, which I’ve been enjoying teaching for the last few years. I look forward to hearing how this plays out for you all — I’m definitely finding part of the challenge of food system work to be getting a few different groups to stay in conversation, and they all make thematic appearances here: the food security/food access/social justice-interested people (especially those working on race and equity issues), the people interested in creating better market conditions for alternative food producers, and the people who are running the existing food system (and who may or may not have stakes in maintaining or changing features of it).

      • catherine 7:15 pm on September 16, 2011 Permalink | Log in to Reply

        I agree, it is a great piece. I love how her students were able to witness the challenges impacting the success of the evaluated programs and had opportunities to break through the limits of their own biases.

  • Brian 10:50 am on August 19, 2011 Permalink |
    Tags: Tag it   

    Next Steps 

    We hope you all had a chance to read participants’ statements on the blog (see directions below) to get a sense of the breadth of experience this group brings to the seminar.

    To continue the dialogue and preparation we are posting a reading (yes, only one reading for now!) by Julie Guthman that addresses the intersection of food systems, education and engagement (“Bringing good food to others: Investigating the subjects of alternative food practice.” Cultural Geographies 2008 15: 431). We would also like each of the participants to submit one or two sources (could be essays, films, etc. ) that similarly address the crossover between these three, and provide some commentary on what you submit via the blog. If you are unable to attach the source, please provide appropriate references so that anyone interested could take a look at them before we meet.

    With this bibliography and your blog posts as our background, we hope to begin online our conversation on how to build successful models for combining education and food system work in a community engaged model. Please feel free to make new posts and/or comment on anything posted on the blog. We hope to build a good start to our conversation online, so when we first meet in Minneapolis, we’ll already hit the road running.

    Bringing good food to others

     
c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel