Recent Updates Page 2 Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • holly 2:16 pm on September 20, 2011 Permalink |  

    I really appreciate Kyle Brown’s use of the term “participatory appraisal processes” and sovereignity in his post. That term helps me to articulate my responses to Kathleen Brandt’s prompts.

    My motivation for this work came from , I believe basically the same place as Kyle’s. I live in this community, my children have grown up here, and i have seen first hand the challenges and assets of the local food system. I had never lived any place before where I saw peers of my children who were hungry. I am fortunate enough that my professional work at the Harward Center at Bates College aligns so well with my personal passions. I was approached about five years ago by a former Bates student, Kirsten Walter, who had, as her senior thesis, started some local gardens in downtown Lewiston, Maine. Her programs had grown, as had her professional responsibilities, so that she now directs the Nutrition Center of Maine. Kirsten was determined to address the root causes of food insecurity in our community and realized that there needed to be a substantive community food assessment to do so. In the meantime, the make up of Lewiston changed dramatically. Over the past ten years, a community of 30,000 people has been transformed by an influx of over 6,000 African refugees and immigrants, most of whom are Somali or Somali Bantu. The combination of these factors and Kirsten Walter’s unwavering passion and commitment to helping to create a food system (not always local) that meets the needs of all of us through accessibility, availability and affordability of healthy culturally appropriate foods has motivated me to engage with the process for the past four years.

    In addition, I realized that a community food assessment would be a unique way to engage students and faculty across the curriculum in community based learning and research.

    I did not have many expectations going into the process as I was not familiar with food systems analysis. There were a number of things that did surprise me, the most outstanding being how generous community members have been to engage in the process and come together with Bates students and faculty to address food systems issues. The other thing that surprised me was how complex our research was to become including such things as studying bus and snow plow routes to outline GIS mapping for access and availability and coming to understand, at least superficially, how the Somali culture impacts food issues.

    One of the most interesting, to me, modes of engagement with the work has been working with what we have come to call our CARS; community action researchers. A number of community members including homeless, single parents, those dealing with issues of mental illness and addiction, and African refugees and immigrants, trained along with students to conduct and interpret research from focus groups. Other methods of research have included phone surveys, a community-wide “charrette” where we presented the research to over 100 community members to educate them about the issue, “analysis fests” where community and college members came together to reflect on the research and to make sure that it created a true picture of the community through the lens of food access, organizing “Good Food Gatherings” to present proposed ways to address these issues, and the creation of a Food Policy Council that will now review findings and suggestions and move forward with solutions. The goal has always been to make sure that the process was ethically conducted and truly community based.

    Some unforeseen outcomes of the project have been how the process has already created change. The bus system was expanded both in hours and scope in response to community members and students petitioning so that people could get to a store after work and on weekends that offered healthy, varied and affordable food choices. Another outcome has been the growth in community capacity to conduct research. The skills that were learned by the community action researchers have been implemented on other, non-food related projects initiated by members of those communities engaged in the food assessment including a survey done by adults about services for those with addictions issues.

    In terms of negative outcomes, as Kyle mentions, sustainability of the project is always an issue as much of the work is dependent on funding from outside sources and the principal investigators n the project are not college faculty but rather community members themselves. In addition, working to honor the role of various communities and individuals in addressing food systems issues take A LOT of time and energy.

     
  • mallika 11:17 am on September 20, 2011 Permalink |  

    Response to questions posed 

    Mallika Bose (mub13@psu.edu)

    Motivation

    The motivation behind my work has been very simple: to get an understanding of the food system of low-income families in Pennsylvania.  The plan is to use this understanding as a springboard for future work related to food system planning. As part of this project I have worked with public housing communities in Harrisburg and Lewistown, and more recently two neighborhoods in West Philadelphia.

     

    Expectations

    I plan to work in this area for an extended period of time.  I hope to understand the complexities of the system and figure out ways of engaging with the actors involved at different locations (being an architect/planner, my worldview is place based, and hence my unit of analysis is at the neighborhood scale) with the intention of being a (positive) change agent.

     

    Modes of engagement

    My work has engaged with community members though I typically do not characterize it as public scholarship, since I only work with a small group of students.  One of my prime motivations for participating in this seminar is to see how others are engaging in work related with the food system through a public scholarship framework.  I have engaged with community members through focus groups and telephone interviews. I have also learned about the food environment of the communities that I am working in by conducting surveys of restaurants/grocery stores/convenience stores at the neighborhood scale.

     

    Unforeseen implications

    Personally, one ramification of my project is finding out the complexities of the food system in this country, and the structural inequalities of the social/political/economic system in which we are all implicated. Grappling with the complexity of the issues is sometimes a roadblock to my personal agency. It is daunting to figure out how to tackle the problem without being overwhelmed by the issues.

     
  • kyle 8:41 pm on September 17, 2011 Permalink |
    Tags:   

    Response to Kathleen’s Request – 9 17 11… 

    Response to Kathleen’s Request – 9/17/11
    Kyle D. Brown (kdbrown@csupomona.edu)
    Motivation for work:
    I have become involved in various food projects over the years, including recent work in the South Los Angeles community of Watts, due to a wide variety of interests. However, I believe my overarching motivation is due to my interest in promoting “ecological sovereignty” for marginalized communities. By ecological sovereignty, I am referring to the notion of local communities asserting control over resources and systems which are critical to their sustainability, including food, water, energy and other ecological resources. Many marginalized communities have realized they cannot rely on traditional institutions (government, free market, or even some aid organizations) to chart sustainable futures, and are exploring strategies to increase their ecological sovereignty. This interest in empowering local communities to become sovereign builds on previous scholarship I have conducted related to critical social consciousness and participatory appraisal processes in communities. Food is an effective access point for many communities to begin considering sovereignty issues.
    While an interest in empowerment and sovereignty describes my personal motivations, these projects typically include a diverse group of experts from a variety of disciplines, who may have different motivations, such as an interest in technological innovation or ecosystem impact. I believe the challenge for our organization is to engage complex and robust problems, which allow multiple interests to effectively engage in the project.
    Expectations:
    Based on my knowledge of our local partner, and experience with other community engagement projects, I had a number of expectations/preconceptions before engaging in the Watts food project. These included:
    1.The partner and the community they represent were passionate about local food, based in large part on the fact that they approached us about the project. This would provide significant momentum for the project.
    2.The partner organization had over 40 years of experience working in Watts promoting economic development and human rights. So sovereignty was a central interest in the organization and they possessed leadership abilities and a strong social network within the community. However previous experience with this partner had raised some concern about their ability to follow through on their commitments.
    3.They viewed our role in the project primarily as one which provides technical assistance on food production and related agro-ecological issues, in support of their established vision for local food. This would mean that broader contributions would have to be carefully crafted in order to be well-received.
    Modes of Engagement:
    The project is in its early stages and is ongoing. However multiple forms of engagement have been utilized and are planned for future work. These include external systems analyses conducted by students and faculty in order to assess the current state of the food system serving Watts, along with a variety of participatory appraisal techniques. I use a framework adapted from international development literature to categorize techniques as spatial (participatory mapping, transect walks, etc.), temporal (seasonal/daily profiles, trend analysis, etc.) and relational (social network mapping, institutional diagramming, etc.). While participatory work is limited on this project today, we expect to engage spatial, temporal, and relational methods throughout this project.
    Unforseen Implications:
    1.Disconnects between our local partner and the broader community were revealed early in the process. Over the past 20 years, the area has transformed from a predominantly African-American community to a predominantly Latino community (primarily Mexican immigrants). So there is a racial dynamic at work that informs power relationships in the community. In addition, early investigations revealed that connections with other institutions and organizations in the community were not as strong as expected. These revelations have added to the challenges of accessing the community and fostering local leadership and capacity on this project.
    2.The partner’s passion for the project was heavily biased toward the production component of the food system and a vision for extensive community gardening anchored by a local demonstration “farm” they had conceptualized prior to engaging us on the project. However, analysis of the food system revealed significant problems and opportunities related to distribution, processing and retailing of food products. These opportunities reinforce other interest of the partner in terms of job training and economic development, but they continue to view this as a gardening/farm development project, as opposed to a broader vision.
    3.The systems approach to sustainability reveals the interrelationship of critical resources. As such, students revealed that the goal of food sovereignty may be dependent on achieving sovereignty related to other critical resources, particularly water. So the way in which these types of projects engage in dialogue concerning other resources is a vital issue.
    4.Our own capacity to follow-through on the opportunities presented by this project is a major limiting factor, given limitations in time, money and other logistical challenges (distance, institutional policies, etc). This reinforces the need to build a broad coalition of partners within the University to sustain this project over time.

     
  • Brian 8:39 pm on September 17, 2011 Permalink |  

    We’re looking forward to meeting you all in… 

    We’re looking forward to meeting you all in Minneapolis next week, and to having a lively and educational seminar around our collective work.  If you have not already read everyone’s original submission to the conference, please do so.  We realize this is a very busy time at the beginning of our semesters, but having these background introductions out of the way before we meet will be a great way to hit the ground running.

    The practices of eating, growing, storing, moving, marketing and disposing of food are fundamental in creating relationships between people, ecologies, technologies and places. Food is inherently multidisciplinary and because of its intimacy (everyone eats) it has become a nexus of increasing public attention focused on a range of critical issues. However, as we quickly begin to realize, our contemporary food systems are highly complex and often shape by multiple stakeholders and by very powerful interests. The „food movement‰ has emerged as a diverse collection of groups and interests seeking to change these system relationships at many different levels. Similarly the participants in this seminar bring together different disciplinary perspectives, critiques and purposes as well as different modes of engagement from policy to performance.  At this important moment in the food movement, we have a great opportunity to reflect on the results, implications, and trajectories of some of our work done to date.

    So, in preparation for next week, we would like each of you to reflect on the project(s) that you described in your seminar proposal, and make one post to the blog describing NOT the project, but rather four aspects of your engagement with it:

    • your motivations for having done the work
    • your expectations going into it
    • your modes of engagement (how you conducted your public/engaged scholarship, for example: stakeholder sessions, focus groups, interviews, etc.)
    • unforeseen implications or ramifications of the project.

    Please organize your post according to these four topics.  We will be taking all of your responses and graphically organizing them in time for our seminar discussion.  It is our intention to use these as starting points for a discussion, with each of you highlighting your contribution briefly (for a minute or two), leaving the majority of the time for conversation about the food meta-system implications of our various efforts.  How might we build on the discovery of unintended implications, unanticipated convergences, unmet expectations, or mutually reinforcing or conflicting modes of engagement as starting points for larger systemic engagements with our food systems? Or, at least, as provocations for the development of different practices for public scholarship?

    Because we have only 90 minutes for our seminar at the conference, we would like to take care of some of the introductory business before we meet.  Our primary goal for the seminar will be to look at our work as a microcosm of food system projects from the “10,000 foot” scale.  A commonly used reference in systems thinking, this scalar viewpoint is intended NOT to be top-down, but rather directly engaged from a meta-perspective.  In our work in interdisciplinary design, food systems, and engaged teaching, we continually discover an array of fantastic projects that often have significant unintended consequences as a result of their lack of this meta-thinking.  If we do see our collective work as a microcosm of projects, and look at these from this 10,000 foot view, we hope to develop a conversation around some of the systems-level implications of our various projects.

    Also, if you haven’t read Julie Guthman’s “Bringing Good Food to Others,” posted on the blog (and attached to this email,) please also read this before we meet.  It offers a tremendously relevant frame to the way we hope to discuss food system/public scholarship issues during the seminar.

    And, as requested in the August 19th post, if you have similarly inspiring sources that address the intersection of food systems, education and engagement, please take a moment to post them, or citations to them, for the rest of the group.

    In order for us to have time to collect and organize your posts, PLEASE MAKE YOUR POST ONLINE BEFORE MIDNIGHT ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 20TH (if possible).

    See you next week,

    Brian, Matt, and Kathleen.

     
  • catherine 2:15 pm on August 28, 2011 Permalink |
    Tags:   

    Hi everyone What a pleasure to be part… 

    Hi everyone,

    What a pleasure to be part of this group! I’m still having trouble accessing the posted article from Cultural Geographies, but hopefully I’ll figure out a way to read it this week. I’ll also try to find some interesting material to post that we can all discuss.

    Wishing you well – Cathy

     
    • Brian 10:42 am on September 2, 2011 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      Hi Cathy,

      I have updated the posted file. The earlier one appears to have been corrupted, but this one should work.

      Brian

    • valentine 5:39 pm on September 16, 2011 Permalink | Log in to Reply

      Re: the article (which has now been emailed around a couple of times for those who haven’t been able to download it) It’s a good piece, which I’ve been enjoying teaching for the last few years. I look forward to hearing how this plays out for you all — I’m definitely finding part of the challenge of food system work to be getting a few different groups to stay in conversation, and they all make thematic appearances here: the food security/food access/social justice-interested people (especially those working on race and equity issues), the people interested in creating better market conditions for alternative food producers, and the people who are running the existing food system (and who may or may not have stakes in maintaining or changing features of it).

      • catherine 7:15 pm on September 16, 2011 Permalink | Log in to Reply

        I agree, it is a great piece. I love how her students were able to witness the challenges impacting the success of the evaluated programs and had opportunities to break through the limits of their own biases.

  • Brian 10:50 am on August 19, 2011 Permalink |
    Tags:   

    Next Steps 

    We hope you all had a chance to read participants’ statements on the blog (see directions below) to get a sense of the breadth of experience this group brings to the seminar.

    To continue the dialogue and preparation we are posting a reading (yes, only one reading for now!) by Julie Guthman that addresses the intersection of food systems, education and engagement (“Bringing good food to others: Investigating the subjects of alternative food practice.” Cultural Geographies 2008 15: 431). We would also like each of the participants to submit one or two sources (could be essays, films, etc. ) that similarly address the crossover between these three, and provide some commentary on what you submit via the blog. If you are unable to attach the source, please provide appropriate references so that anyone interested could take a look at them before we meet.

    With this bibliography and your blog posts as our background, we hope to begin online our conversation on how to build successful models for combining education and food system work in a community engaged model. Please feel free to make new posts and/or comment on anything posted on the blog. We hope to build a good start to our conversation online, so when we first meet in Minneapolis, we’ll already hit the road running.

    Bringing good food to others

     
  • Brian 4:32 pm on August 2, 2011 Permalink |  

    Welcome! 

    We’d like to welcome you to the Sustaining Sustenance blog, developed in preparation for our seminar together in Minneapolis at the 2011 Imagining America conference.

    As we mentioned earlier in our email via Matt, we have setup the blog to enable all the participants to read the submissions of each other, and ultimately to host a conversation regarding some of the key questions that appear in your submissions in advance of the conference.

    All of the participants’ submissions, as well as our original call for submissions, appear in the right-hand sidebar. You can read and comment on any of these as you wish. This main page will host the main threaded conversation. In order to make a post to the blog (which we hope that all of you will do!), you will need to login with the credentials sent to you via email.

    We will be making a follow-up post shortly with additional details and provocations for the conference, but feel free to engage in the blog with new topic posts or comments on other posts at any time!

    We look forward to the discussion.

    Brian, Kathleen, and Matt

     
c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel